<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online ad engagement 25 times higher than click rate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.coull.com/2009/10/29/online-ad-engagement-25-times-higher-than-click-rate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.coull.com/2009/10/29/online-ad-engagement-25-times-higher-than-click-rate/</link>
	<description>The official blog of the Video Performance Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:14:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://blog.coull.com/2009/10/29/online-ad-engagement-25-times-higher-than-click-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-25793</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.coull.com/2009/10/29/online-ad-engagement-25-times-higher-than-click-rate/#comment-25793</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d suggest that with video display advertisers have to sell up against TV dwell-time is a bit too academic.  

Sales houses are trying to quantify online video ads in terms of TV-like GRP as that&#039;s what the client knows.  At least CPM can be extrapolated to a rough GRP figure; dwell time might make such a calculation a step too far.

The FMCG companies know what they are paying ($-wise) for notional eyeballs with their TV ads so they need a comparable measurement for their online video too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d suggest that with video display advertisers have to sell up against TV dwell-time is a bit too academic.  </p>
<p>Sales houses are trying to quantify online video ads in terms of TV-like GRP as that&#8217;s what the client knows.  At least CPM can be extrapolated to a rough GRP figure; dwell time might make such a calculation a step too far.</p>
<p>The FMCG companies know what they are paying ($-wise) for notional eyeballs with their TV ads so they need a comparable measurement for their online video too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention blog.coull.com » Blog Archive » Online ad engagement 25 times higher than click rate -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.coull.com/2009/10/29/online-ad-engagement-25-times-higher-than-click-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-25427</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention blog.coull.com » Blog Archive » Online ad engagement 25 times higher than click rate -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.coull.com/2009/10/29/online-ad-engagement-25-times-higher-than-click-rate/#comment-25427</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by irfon watkins and Vaughan Denny, Coull. Coull said: New Blog Post: Online ad engagement 25 times higher than click rate http://ow.ly/15Ydl9 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by irfon watkins and Vaughan Denny, Coull. Coull said: New Blog Post: Online ad engagement 25 times higher than click rate <a href="http://ow.ly/15Ydl9" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/15Ydl9</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

